DEC-NET Serial number GB516 |
|
Published online | 21/11/2005 14.53.00 |
Last updated | 21/11/2005 15.33.13 |
| |
| |
This trial has been approved by an ethics committee |
Current trial status | Open (actively recruiting new participants) |
First subject enrolment Target N. of subjects |
10/2002 100 |
Major Disease (ICD9 class) | OTHER SPECIFIED INFANTILE CEREBRAL PALSY |
Experimental drug |
BACLOFEN
Treatment regimen (dosage and duration) Dose titrated to response. Given intrathecally via medtronic device |
Gender | Both |
Age (range) | 5 - 18 years |
Eligibility criteria |
Inclusion criteria |
Ambulant children with cerebral palsy |
Exclusion criteria |
Pure dystonia of other origin than cerebral palsy |
Trial design/methodology |
Phase | 4 |
Kind of study | Efficacy Prophylaxis Safety
|
Design | Controlled Randomised Blinded Single blind
|
Purpose of study |
Does Continuous infusion of intrathecal Baclofen in ambulant children improve mobillity, activities of daily living and quality of life. |
Primary outcomes |
This study will assess whether this technique is of significant benefit on tone, mobility, self help skills and quality of life. |
Secondary outcomes |
Cost benefit analysis of ITB vs Orthopaedic treatment and conservative management |
Summary of study design, objectives, and ongoing research findings |
The use of Baclofen in spasticity is well established, this efficacy audit aims to investigate the right indications of when to use it.
Mild RCT with direct progression to treatment vs delay of 9 months before implant. The effect of this delay is monitored by means of quantifyable measures, GMFM, PEDI, QOLC etc. Initial results show ITB to be effective in both ambulant and non-ambulant spasticity. However no clear effect has been found on gait and function, so far.
|